Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2004-05-01 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2004-05-01 Senate Journal Page 3216 SB 354 CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 354(STA) "An Act relating to complaints filed with, and investigations, hearings, and orders of, the State Commission for Human Rights; making conforming amendments; and providing for an effective date" was read the third time. Senator Guess moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 1. Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Guess offered Amendment No. 1 : Page 2, line 24: Delete "for administrative convenience" Insert "of complaints" Page 2, line 26: Delete "for administrative convenience" Page 2, line 27: Delete "in the executive director's discretion" Insert "with the concurrence of the commission" Page 3, line 3: Delete all material. 2004-05-01 Senate Journal Page 3217 Renumber the following paragraphs accordingly. Page 3, line 5, following "facts;": Insert "or" Page 3, line 6: Delete all material. Renumber the following paragraphs accordingly. Page 3, line 7: Delete ";" Insert "." Page 3, lines 8 - 9: Delete all material. Senator Guess moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 1. Senator Ben Stevens objected. Senator Green called the Senate. The call was satisfied. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 354(STA) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Guess, Hoffman, Lincoln, Olson Nays: Bunde, Cowdery, Dyson, Green, Ogan, Seekins, Stedman, Stevens B, Stevens G, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken Bunde changed from "Yea" to "Nay". and so, Amendment No. 1 failed. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 354(STA) was automatically in third reading. 2004-05-01 Senate Journal Page 3218 Senator Guess moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 2. Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Guess offered Amendment No. 2 : Page 4, lines 18 - 19: Delete ". The commission may not order an award of noneconomic or punitive damages in any case" Senator Guess moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 2. Senator Green objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 354(STA) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Guess, Hoffman, Lincoln, Ogan, Olson Nays: Bunde, Cowdery, Dyson, Green, Seekins, Stedman, Stevens B, Stevens G, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 2 failed. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 354(STA) was automatically in third reading. Senator Guess moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 3. Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Guess offered Amendment No. 3 : Page 4, line 21, following "order": Insert "appropriate relief, including but not limited to" 2004-05-01 Senate Journal Page 3219 Page 5, line 12: Delete "[, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO,]" Insert ", but not be limited to," Senator Guess moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 3. Senator Ben Stevens objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 354(STA) Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Guess, Hoffman, Lincoln, Olson Nays: Bunde, Cowdery, Dyson, Green, Ogan, Seekins, Stedman, Stevens B, Stevens G, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 3 failed. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 354(STA) was automatically in third reading. The question being: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 354(STA) "An Act relating to complaints filed with, and investigations, hearings, and orders of, the State Commission for Human Rights; making conforming amendments; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 354(STA) Third Reading - Final Passage YEAS: 13 NAYS: 7 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bunde, Cowdery, Dyson, Green, Hoffman, Ogan, Seekins, Stedman, Stevens B, Stevens G, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken Nays: Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Guess, Lincoln, Olson and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 354(STA) passed the Senate. 2004-05-01 Senate Journal Page 3220 Senator Ben Stevens moved for the adoption of the effective date clauses. The question being: "Shall the effective date clauses be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 354(STA) Effective Date Clauses YEAS: 13 NAYS: 7 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bunde, Cowdery, Dyson, Green, Hoffman, Ogan, Seekins, Stedman, Stevens B, Stevens G, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken Nays: Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Guess, Lincoln, Olson and so, the effective date clauses failed to be adopted. Senator Seekins gave notice of reconsideration on CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 354(STA)(efd fld) "An Act relating to complaints filed with, and investigations, hearings, and orders of, the State Commission for Human Rights; and making conforming amendments."